Chemistry Labs

Problem 2

In interstellar space, HX2\ce{H2} forms on the surface of dust grains because two colliding H atoms cannot dissipate the bond energy. The rate constant for adsorption is ka=1.4×10−5 cm3 s−1k_a = 1.4 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{cm}^3\ \text{s}^{-1}, the H-atom number density is [H]=10 cm−3[\ce{H}] = 10\ \text{cm}^{-3}, the first-order desorption constant is kd=1.9×10−3 s−1k_d = 1.9 \times 10^{-3}\ \text{s}^{-1}, and the surface-reaction constant is kr=5.1×104 s−1k_r = 5.1 \times 10^{4}\ \text{s}^{-1} (surface atom numbers may be used like concentrations). Model A treats reaction as second order: dN/dt=ka[H]−kdN−krN2dN/dt = k_a[\ce{H}] - k_d N - k_r N^2. Model B limits each grain to 0, 1 or 2 atoms with fractions x0,x1,x2x_0, x_1, x_2 and rates: adsorption ka[H]xmk_a[\ce{H}]x_m, desorption kd m xmk_d\,m\,x_m, reaction 12kr m(m−1)xm\tfrac{1}{2}k_r\,m(m-1)x_m. (a) Find the steady-state NN and the rate of HX2\ce{H2} production per grain in each model. (b) Computer simulations give a true rate of 9.4×10−6 s−19.4 \times 10^{-6}\ \text{s}^{-1}; which model is consistent, and which step is rate-determining?
Step 2 of 4: Model A: quadratic steady state
ka[H]=kdN+krN2⇒N=−kd+kd2+4krka[H]2kr=5.2×10−5;vHX2=12krN2=7.0×10−5 s−1k_a[\ce{H}] = k_d N + k_r N^2 \Rightarrow N = \dfrac{-k_d + \sqrt{k_d^2 + 4k_r k_a[\ce{H}]}}{2k_r} = 5.2 \times 10^{-5};\quad v_{\ce{H2}} = \tfrac{1}{2}k_r N^2 = 7.0 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{s}^{-1}
Analysis

Adding the reaction term makes NN the positive root of krN2+kdN−ka[H]=0k_r N^2 + k_d N - k_a[\ce{H}] = 0, giving N=5.2×10−5N = 5.2 \times 10^{-5}. The HX2\ce{H2} formation rate is 12krN2=7.0×10−5 s−1\tfrac{1}{2}k_r N^2 = 7.0 \times 10^{-5}\ \text{s}^{-1} per grain — about 7 times the simulated value.

Common pitfall. The factor 1/2 in 12krN2\tfrac{1}{2}k_rN^2 prevents double counting of the two H atoms consumed per HX2\ce{H2}.