Chemistry Labs

Nuclear and radiochemistry

Processing and Recycling Nuclear Fuel

Chemical separation of irradiated nuclear fuel recovers uranium and plutonium, isolates long-lived minor actinides, and vitrifies high-level waste for geologic disposal.

IntuitionIntuition: closing the nuclear fuel cycle

When a nuclear fuel assembly is discharged from a commercial light-water reactor after several years of power generation, it is far from empty. Over 95% of the original heavy metal atoms remain unreacted uranium, alongside roughly 1% plutonium bred in situ by neutron capture, 4% intensely radioactive fission products, and minor actinides. In an open once-through cycle, this entire assembly is discarded into cooling ponds and geological repositories, entombing vast energy while requiring radiation containment for over 100,000 years. Chemical reprocessing treats spent fuel as an artificial ore, extracting reusable fissile material while shrinking the long-term toxicity footprint.

Compare three fuel cycle flowsheets: the open once-through cycle disposing of all actinides as waste; the closed PUREX cycle separating uranium and plutonium for MOX recycling with waste vitrification; and advanced partitioning separating minor actinides (Am, Cm) for transmutation in fast reactors or accelerator-driven systems. Legend colors track uranium (blue), plutonium and actinides (red), and waste (brown).

SchoolSchool level: spent fuel inventory and the PUREX process

Definition: Spent LWR Fuel Composition and Radiotoxicity Timeline

Standard light-water reactor (LWR) fuel discharged at a burnup of 50 GWd/tHM50\ \text{GWd/tHM} (gigawatt-days per metric ton of heavy metal) consists of ∼95%\sim 95\% uranium (chiefly 238U^{238}\text{U} with residual 235U≈0.8-1.2%^{235}\text{U} \approx 0.8\text{-}1.2\%), ∼1%\sim 1\% plutonium (principally fissile 239Pu,241Pu^{239}\text{Pu}, {}^{241}\text{Pu} alongside fertile 240Pu,238Pu^{240}\text{Pu}, {}^{238}\text{Pu}), ∼4%\sim 4\% fission products (137Cs,90Sr,99Tc^{137}\text{Cs}, {}^{90}\text{Sr}, {}^{99}\text{Tc}, lanthanides), and ∼0.1%\sim 0.1\% minor actinides (Np,Am,Cm\text{Np}, \text{Am}, \text{Cm}). In the initial 300 years300\text{ years}, radiotoxicity and decay heat are dominated by fission products (137Cs^{137}\text{Cs} and 90Sr^{90}\text{Sr}); beyond 300 years300\text{ years}, transuranic actinides dominate the radiotoxic burden for hundreds of thousands of years.

Commercial reprocessing is dominated by the PUREX (Plutonium URanium EXtraction) process. In the head-end stage, bundles are sheared into small lengths (3-5 cm3\text{-}5\text{ cm}) and dissolved in boiling 3-6 M HNOX33\text{-}6\ \text{M}\ \ce{HNO3}. The Zircaloy cladding hulls remain intact and are removed. Uranium dissolves as uranyl ion [UOX2X2+][\ce{UO2^2+}], plutonium oxidizes to PuX4+\ce{Pu^4+}, while volatile gases (X85X2285Kr,X129X22129I,X14X2214C,X3X223H\ce{^{85}Kr}, \ce{^{129}I}, \ce{^{14}C}, \ce{^3H}) are trapped in off-gas scrubbing columns. Insoluble residues of noble fission metals (fines of Ru, Rh, Pd, Mo, Tc) are separated by high-speed centrifugal clarifiers. The clarified aqueous solution is fed to a countercurrent extraction contactor where it meets an organic phase composed of 30% v/v30\%\ \text{v/v} tri-nn-butyl phosphate (TBP, (CX4HX9O)X3P=O\ce{(C4H9O)3P=O}) diluted in an aliphatic hydrocarbon like nn-dodecane.

Comparison of Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Technologies
TechnologyMediumSeparated streamsProliferation barrierWaste matrix
Once-through (Open)None (direct storage)No separation (spent fuel)Radiation barrier of spent fuelDirect deep geologic disposal
PUREX (Standard)30% TBP in dodecanePure U, pure Pu, HLW raffinatePure Pu separated (IAEA safeguards)Borosilicate glass canisters
COEX / UREX+Organophosphates + aminePure U, co-extracted U+Pu mixNo pure separated Pu streamBorosilicate glass canisters
DIAMEX-SANEXMalonamides + N-ligandsAn(III) separated from Ln(III)Actinides routed to transmutationShort-lived FP glass (300 yr heat)
PyroprocessingMolten LiCl-KCl salt (500 °C)U on steel, U+TRU in liquid CdPu never separated from minor actinidesSodalite ceramic + metal ingots

UndergraduateUndergraduate: extraction equilibria, U/Pu partition, and solvent degradation

Liquid-liquid extraction in PUREX relies on the selective formation of neutral, lipophilic adducts between metal nitrates and tri-nn-butyl phosphate. The distribution ratio DM=[M]org/[M]aqD_{\text{M}} = [\text{M}]_{\text{org}} / [\text{M}]_{\text{aq}} defines extraction efficiency. In 3-4 M HNOX33\text{-}4\ \text{M}\ \ce{HNO3}, both hexavalent uranyl UOX2X2+\ce{UO2^2+} and tetravalent plutonium PuX4+\ce{Pu^4+} are readily solvated by TBP, yielding D>10D > 10. In sharp contrast, trivalent lanthanides (LnX3+\ce{Ln^3+}), trivalent minor actinides (AmX3+,CmX3+\ce{Am^3+}, \ce{Cm^3+}), and common fission fragments like X137X22137CsX+\ce{^{137}Cs+} and X90X2290SrX2+\ce{^{90}Sr^2+} exhibit D<0.001D < 0.001, remaining quantitatively in the aqueous nitric acid raffinate (High-Level Liquid Waste).

UOX2X2++2 NOX3X−+2 TBPˉ⇌UO2(NO3)2⋅2TBPˉ\ce{UO2^2+ + 2NO3- + 2\bar{TBP} <=> \bar{UO2(NO3)2\cdot 2TBP}}
PuX4++4 NOX3X−+2 TBPˉ⇌Pu(NO3)4⋅2TBPˉ\ce{Pu^4+ + 4NO3- + 2\bar{TBP} <=> \bar{Pu(NO3)4\cdot 2TBP}}

Once uranium and plutonium are co-extracted into the TBP phase, they must be partitioned into separate product streams. In the partition contactor, a reducing aqueous stream containing uranous nitrate (UX4+\ce{U^4+}, stabilized by hydrazine to scavenge nitrous acid) or hydroxylamine nitrate (NHX3OHX+ NOX3X−\ce{NH3OH+ NO3-}) selectively reduces plutonium from PuX4+\ce{Pu^4+} to PuX3+\ce{Pu^3+}: 2 PuX4++UX4++2 HX2O→2 PuX3++UOX2X2++4 HX+\ce{2Pu^4+ + U^4+ + 2H2O -> 2Pu^3+ + UO2^2+ + 4H+}. Because trivalent plutonium has a very low distribution ratio (DPu(III)≈0.01D_{\text{Pu(III)}} \approx 0.01), it strips quantitatively into the aqueous stream, while hexavalent UOX2X2+\ce{UO2^2+} remains unreduced in the organic phase. In a subsequent column, uranium is back-extracted into dilute nitric acid (∼0.01 M HNOX3\sim 0.01\ \text{M}\ \ce{HNO3}), where DU(VI)D_{\text{U(VI)}} falls below 0.1.

funextracted=E−1En+1−1whereE=D⋅VorgVaqf_{\text{unextracted}} = \frac{E - 1}{E^{n+1} - 1} \quad \text{where} \quad E = D \cdot \frac{V_{\text{org}}}{V_{\text{aq}}}

Example: Plutonium Recovery in Countercurrent Solvent Extraction

A spent PWR fuel assembly containing 1.00 tHM1.00\ \text{tHM} (metric ton of heavy metal) discharged at 50 GWd/tHM50\ \text{GWd/tHM} is reprocessed. Chemical assay shows that it contains 935 kg935\ \text{kg} of uranium and 11.0 kg11.0\ \text{kg} of plutonium. In the countercurrent extraction battery, the aqueous feed and the 30% TBP30\%\ \text{TBP} organic solvent flow at equal volumetric rates (Vorg/Vaq=1.0V_{\text{org}}/V_{\text{aq}} = 1.0). At the operating nitric acid concentration, the distribution ratio for PuX4+\ce{Pu^4+} is D=5.0D = 5.0, yielding an extraction factor E=D×1.0=5.0E = D \times 1.0 = 5.0. Using the Kremser equation, calculate the theoretical percentage of unextracted plutonium remaining in the aqueous raffinate after n=3n = 3 equilibrium countercurrent stages, and determine the mass of plutonium recovered from this fuel batch in kilograms.

Solution

Apply the Kremser equation for pure entering solvent: funextracted=E−1En+1−1f_{\text{unextracted}} = \frac{E - 1}{E^{n+1} - 1}. For E=5.0E = 5.0 and n=3n = 3: denominator En+1−1=5.04−1=625−1=624E^{n+1} - 1 = 5.0^4 - 1 = 625 - 1 = 624; numerator E−1=5.0−1=4.0E - 1 = 5.0 - 1 = 4.0. Thus funextracted=4.0624≈0.00641=0.641%f_{\text{unextracted}} = \frac{4.0}{624} \approx 0.00641 = 0.641\%. The extraction recovery fraction is 1−0.00641=0.99359=99.36%1 - 0.00641 = 0.99359 = 99.36\%. For 11.0 kg11.0\ \text{kg} of input plutonium, the recovered mass is mrecovered=11.0 kg×0.99359≈10.93 kgm_{\text{recovered}} = 11.0\ \text{kg} \times 0.99359 \approx 10.93\ \text{kg} of Pu\ce{Pu}. The remaining 0.07 kg0.07\ \text{kg} reports to the high-level waste raffinate.

AdvancedAdvanced: minor actinide separation, pyrochemistry, and vitrification

Advanced aqueous reprocessing partitions minor actinides (AmX3+,CmX3+\ce{Am^3+}, \ce{Cm^3+}) from trivalent lanthanides (LnX3+\ce{Ln^3+}) in PUREX raffinate. Because lanthanides possess massive neutron-absorption cross-sections, minor actinides cannot be transmuted without first removing lanthanides. The DIAMEX process uses neutral malonamides (such as DMDOHEMA, adhering to the completely incinerable CHON principle) to co-extract An(III)+Ln(III)\text{An(III)} + \text{Ln(III)}. Subsequently, the SANEX process utilizes soft nitrogen-donor heterocyclic ligands (like bis-triazinylpyridines, BTP, and CyMe4-BTBP\text{CyMe}_4\text{-BTBP}). The slightly greater spatial extension and covalency of actinide 5f5f orbitals over localized lanthanide 4f4f orbitals allows soft nitrogen donors to selectively coordinate AmX3+\ce{Am^3+} and CmX3+\ce{Cm^3+} with separation factors βAn/Ln>100\beta_{\text{An/Ln}} > 100.

Pyroprocessing replaces nitric acid and organic solvents with high-temperature molten inorganic salts (LiCl−KCl\ce{LiCl-KCl} eutectic at 450-500∘C450\text{-}500^\circ\text{C}). Chopped metallic or oxide fuel (electroreduced to metal) is loaded into an anode basket in an electrorefiner. An electric potential dissolves actinides at the anode: uranium deposits onto a solid steel cathode, while plutonium, americium, and curium co-deposit into a liquid cadmium or bismuth cathode. Because pure plutonium cannot be chemically separated from minor actinides in this regime, pyroprocessing provides intrinsic proliferation resistance and directly cycles fuel into sodium-cooled fast reactors. For aqueous waste, high-level liquid waste is calcined into dry oxides, blended with borosilicate glass frit, and induction-melted at ∼1150∘C\sim 1150^\circ\text{C} into stable glass canisters for long-term geologic disposal.

ResearchResearch and frontier: closed fuel cycles, partitioning, and nonproliferation

References

  • Advanced Separation Techniques for Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing and Radioactive Waste Treatment · K. L. Nash & G. J. Lumetta (eds.), 2011
  • Reprocessing and Recycling of Spent Nuclear Fuel · R. J. Taylor (ed.), 2015
  • Radioactive waste partitioning and transmutation within advanced fuel cycles: Achievements and challenges · M. Salvatores & G. Palmiotti, 2011