Michaelis–Menten assay: spotting the inhibitor type
Run virtual rate measurements at eight substrate concentrations, then classify an unknown inhibitor by how Km and Vmax respond — the core skill of enzyme kinetics.
Goal
Distinguish competitive, non-competitive and uncompetitive inhibition on the curve and predict what each does to a Lineweaver–Burk plot.
Apparatus and reagents
Virtual assay: substrate stock (0–8 mM), the same enzyme batch (, mM), and an inhibitor added at fixed ; the simulation replays idealized curves.
Procedure
- Select “none” and hover at mM: confirm , reading off .
- Switch to the competitive inhibitor: the plateau is unchanged but the half-saturation point moved right — measure the new apparent .
- Select non-competitive: now the plateau dropped to half while stayed at 1 mM.
- Try uncompetitive: both and halved — a rare signature where inhibition needs the ES complex.
- Sketch 1/v versus 1/[S] for each case by hand: parallel lines signal uncompetitive, a shared y-intercept competitive.
What to observe
- Competitive: rises while is untouched — the inhibitor only competes for the free enzyme.
- Non-competitive: falls but is fixed — inhibitor binds E and ES equally, removing active enzyme.
- Uncompetitive: the curve gets both lower and steeper near the origin — binding to ES removes complex and pulls more ES forward.
Explanation
The three textbook mechanisms differ in where the inhibitor binds: to E (competitive, so extra substrate outcompetes it and ), to E and ES equally (non-competitive, ), or to ES only (uncompetitive, dividing both constants by ). On a double-reciprocal plot these become intersecting lines at the y-axis, parallel lines, and lines sharing the x-intercept — which is why Lineweaver–Burk plots still teach mechanism even though fitting is now done non-linearly.
History of the experiment
Chemists behind it
Virtual experiment: a simplified model to build intuition. It does not replace real lab work or safety training; never repeat chemistry at home without supervision.